Evidence at the point of care.

You know the number. Eighteen minutes with each patient in the United States; about two in India. The notes and the inbox wait for the evening. The next patient brings a screenshot from the family group chat and asks you to explain it. At 2 a.m. you need a dose, so you ask the chatbot everyone uses. It sounds certain. It shows no source you can check. It owes your patient nothing. You carry what it gets wrong.

Asha for clinicians (1:34). Benchmark transcripts in the film are rendered in a chat layout, abridged and labelled; they are not app screenshots. Every Asha screen is real, captured 16 September 2026.

Built for exactly this

The citation gap, measured

The habit that matters most at the point of care is the one general assistants skip: showing the source. On HealthBench Professional, 524 shared items, September 2026, graded by GPT-5.4, a bare frontier model answered with no citation at all on 74% of items. Asha, running on the same underlying model inside her architecture, cited nothing on 0.6%.

Citations are the floor. On the benchmark’s official length-adjusted metric (525 items, 14 September 2026, graded by Claude Opus 4.8, two trials pooled), Asha’s best configuration scored 65.1 and the leading bare frontier model 67.0 in the same harness with the same grader. The full board, including the runs where Asha did not lead, is on the public register at dnai.systems/benchmarks. Neurosymbolic, and tested in public: every run with its harness, its grader and its date.

Research preview, by invitation

Asha for clinicians opens as a research preview on 1 October 2026. Full access goes to the first hundred invited clinicians who give feedback. Verification is self-serve: in the United States by NPI against the NPPES registry, in India by NMC registration number. Verified professionals use the clinician mode free. Read more at Asha for clinicians.

Built by physicians. A fiduciary healthcare AI that always has your back. Evidence at the point of care.

Asha for clinicians

Or ask a question first: askasha.org. Five questions, no account.

Sources and labels

  • Neprash HT et al. Measuring primary care exam length using electronic health record data. Medical Care, 2021 (21 million visits; PMID 33301282).
  • Irving G et al. International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries. BMJ Open, 2017 (PMID 29118053).
  • Citation rate: HealthBench Professional, 524 shared items, Claude Sonnet 5 bare vs Asha on the same model, GPT-5.4 grader, September 2026. Register row and artifacts at dnai.systems/benchmarks.
  • Official metric: HealthBench Professional, 525 items, 14 September 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 grader (every arm also graded by GPT-5.4 low and gpt-4.1), two trials pooled. Arora et al., arXiv:2505.08775.
  • Film: Asha for clinicians, v11 (US) and v10 (India), 94 seconds, DNAi Systems, 17 September 2026. Organic release; the benchmark transcripts shown are abridged and labelled.
For patients in crisis: United States: call or text 988. India: emergency 112; Tele-MANAS 14416, free, 24x7.